The writer is a former Saratoga Springs mayor and county supervisor.
We who live in Saratoga Springs are blessed to have many valuable private and non-profit institutions that contribute to our quality of life and the economic benefit of our city.
These include industries that provide employment, popular entertainment venues, good restaurants, our churches, youth activities, Skidmore College, human service providers, and many more. We need to bond together to be sure we can maintain that good environment.
I encourage all citizens to review the new proposal that will change our form of government from the commission system.
This is where the City Council is made up of five elected department heads, one of whom is the mayor, to a seven member policy-making City Council.
This council will be made up of citizens who will represent our point of view when decisions are made about what direction the city government should pursue. They won’t have the responsibility for managing a department.
Pretty much every local government endeavor has changed to be such more complex and move faster than it did when we were a young city 100 years ago.
Our government needs an administrative manager who can carry out the policies set by our citizen council, with training in personnel management, allocation of resources and budgeted funds, interaction with other levels of government, and compliance with the current laws of the land.
Citizen leadership in policy, with professional management that answers to the council and carries out those policies, will provide the best and most economical services that we require.
Many more of our citizens will be able to consider the public service of running for the City Council when they do not also have to manage a department — their job will be only to make the decisions about policy, as our citizens wish.
We will have a much broader, varied pool ready to serve.
The proposed staggered four-year terms will provide for new blood from time to time, but always members with knowledge of what went before.
In a phrase, it’s time, Saratoga. In November, vote yes for charter change — You’ll be glad you did.
Letter To The Editor | August 8, 2017
Some of Saratoga Springs’ longest tenured residents have been speaking up against the proposed change in the city charter. “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it,” they say. “You newcomers just don’t know how the system works.”
Well, if that were true, we would have had a parking garage near the City Center more than 10 years ago, when the idea was first broached.
We would have had a public safety and emergency services building to serve thousands of residents and visitors east of the Northway. Instead, in both cases, all we have now is a bunch of court cases. Also, our water system might not be showing signs of stress, having been outpaced by growth and development.
The old-timers tell you they know how to get things done, but what they really mean is that they know how to stop almost any innovation they don’t like by pushing one or more politicians’ buttons.
City employees told the Charter Review Commission they spend too much time dealing with political conflict between departments, frustrating completion of their assigned duties.
Under the proposed charter, the City Council will have the responsibility to set priorities.
The manager they hire will be charged with carrying them out under a unified administrative structure just like the ones that every other local government in New York state has, except Mechanicville, which is like ours.
The governmental structure we seek in the proposed charter is one that promotes efficiency, accountability and savings to the taxpayer.
I have lived here more than 45 years. I will be voting yes for a new City Charter on Nov. 7 and urging my friends to do so as well.
Gordon Boyd Saratoga Springs The writer is a member of the Saratoga Springs Charter Review Commission.
The Saratoga Springs Charter Review Commission did not make its decision to propose a new charter lightly. The 15-member citizen nonpartisan commission spent seven months assessing how the city government is working.
We interviewed 23 former and present City Council members about how well they thought the commission form of government is working. We interviewed department heads, former deputy commissioners, and surveyed City Hall employees to understand their perspectives on how the charter affects their ability to perform their jobs. We also conducted extensive individual interviews with local business leaders, non profits, consultants that work closely with the city. We also surveyed 182 potential City Council candidates about their willingness to run for office under the current charter vs. alternative charters.
After we finished our draft charter, we embarked on a listening phase to find out how we could make our charter better. We held two town meetings, met with area business leaders, city hall employees, former Charter Review Commission members, and city attorneys. We received highly detailed emails and had countless conversations from the public. We made more than 20 large and small changes on issues ranging from the city council salary and benefits, city attorney, county supervisors, civil service, audits, and transparency to name a few.
After 14 months, 36 full open-to-the-public commission meetings, 40 subcommittee meetings, three town halls and public information sessions, and innumerable conversations with citizens, the citizen Saratoga Springs Charter Review Commission voted to put a new city charter on the Nov. 7 ballot.
The number of cities with the commission form of government has declined from 500 to 28. The commission system is a remnant of the corrupt machine politics of the early 1900s. Saratoga Springs is a leading 21st century global city that can do better than an antiquated system from 100 years ago.
The writer is chair of the Saratoga Springs Charter Review Commission.
By Ann Casey Bullock, Member of the Saratoga Springs Charter Review Commission, July 30, 2017
Ask yourself: do you work for five different (equal) bosses? Our City employees do–and our citizens need to know how to navigate between five co-equal departments in order to get anything accomplished at City Hall. Saratoga Springs should adopt the Council-Manager form of government, widely used across the country, to create a Council, responsive to citizens’ needs and separate from the administrative offices. The administration of the City, headed by a professional manager, is answerable to the Council and citizens: it is not a disconnected bureaucracy. Ask me or any of the Charter Review Commissioners about the proposed new Charter; read the proposed Charter on our website (https://saratogacharter.com/category/documents/); please vote YES in November!
Mayor Joanne Yepsen urged voters on Tuesday to adopt a new charter that would change the city’s form of government.
In making the case for adopting a council-manager form during a press conference hosted by the city’s Charter Review Commission, Yepsen said the current commission form requires too much of part-time city officials like herself, who earn $14,000 per year — echoing the reasons she gave when she announced earlier this month that she would not seek re-election to a third two-year term.
Before the announcement, at least publicly, she had stayed neutral on the proposal, saying she had appointed the commission to review the charter because the mayor is required to do so every 10 years.
“You can’t do it anymore, you guys — you just can’t,” she said. “So please, please, please spread the word. You need to look at this charter very carefully, and I hope you adopt change this coming November.”
The 15-member commission hosted an open house on its final charter draft from 10 a.m. to 9 p.m. in the City Center, with Yepsen and several others speaking between 4 and 5:30 p.m.
The proposal, which will go before the voters as a referendum in November, would replace the four commissioners and mayor with a seven-member council, which would include and be presided over by the mayor. Council members, including the mayor, would serve four-year terms. The move would save the city about $466,000 annually, commission members estimated, by replacing four deputy commissioners and the deputy mayor with a city manager.
That estimate assumes the city manager would earn $125,000 per year, but the position’s salary would ultimately be decided by the City Council.
Public Safety Commissioner Chris Mathiesen, who is also not seeking re-election, agreed with Yepsen that the current form is limiting and the proposal would open the door for more candidates to seek office in the city. He said one reason for not seeking a fourth two-year term is that, “Frankly, I can’t do it — physically, emotionally — I really can’t do it anymore.”
“I can’t live on $14,000 a year, and so I practice dentistry at my practice on West Avenue,” he said. “And when I’m not on West Avenue, I’m at City Hall. After a while, it just gets to be too much.”
Mathiesen also said people don’t understand how the current system works, citing a conversation he had with a constituent in which he mentioned he wasn’t running for City Council this year. Under the city’s century-old form of government, Mathiesen helps make up the City Council while also overseeing public safety.
“They said, ‘City Council? I thought you were commissioner of something.’”
Ray Watkin, who served as mayor from 1974 to 1980, said he used to be an advocate for keeping the current form of government, but that was when the city had non-partisan elections that didn’t involve people running on a party line. The city moved to partisan elections in 1980.
“The commission form of government is quite unusual to begin with, and when you put partisan politics in it, it certainly poisons the water,” he said. “The form of government we have is strange. Most people know little about it, most people don’t participate in it, the number of candidates that we have at this moment with the coming elections — there are very few.”
Those who do participate as commissioners work independently of each other, he said, calling their departments “fiefdoms.” He noted that commissioners have dual powers as legislators and department heads, which is “quite different than most cities have.”
“I read the charter that’s purposed, and I think they did an excellent job,” he said. “It’s not perfect, but it’s necessary to let people participate.”
A.C. Riley, who was mayor from 1990 to 1995, said she likes the idea of a city run by a professional, which the proposed charter change would mandate.
“If you look at our present form of government, what we’re doing is electing department heads, and the only requirement is that you be over 18 and that you live in the city,” she said.
Sharon Addison, a city manager for Watertown, said she is in constant communication with council members — by phone, text, email and in meetings.
“My goal is transparency,” she said. “They know what I’m working on, they know what my department heads are working on, and I think that goes a long way when you’re trying to build collaboration and communication.”
Bob Turner, the Charter Review Commission’s chairman, said a couple hundred people attended the open house before 5 p.m. and that the group’s public outreach is just beginning. The proposal is the result of about a year’s worth of research and more than 50 meetings, he said.
“They don’t have to come to us — we will go to them,” he said, saying commission members will be spreading the word at farmers markers, art fairs, festivals, and booths on Broadway. “This is a significant change that we are asking the citizens of Saratoga Springs to make, and we know that they want all the information to make an informed and educated decision.”
A copy of the charter proposal can be viewed online at www.SaratogaCharter.com.
The Saratoga Springs Charter Review Commission invites you to a City Charter Information Open House. Learn about the Proposed Charter at this public education event!
Tuesday, May 30
10:00 am – 9:00 pm
Refreshments at 11 am, 4 pm, 7 pm
Saratoga Springs City Center
The final draft of the Proposed Charter will be available in print at the Open House and online.
The purpose of the open house is to showcase the proposed charter that will be voted on November 7, 2017. The open house will feature “Topic based” areas so attendees can seek information according to their interests. The forum will afford attendees as much time as they wish to explore topics they are most interested in.
Guest speakers, Commission members and subject matter experts will be available throughout the day.
The main Topics Include:
Saratoga Springs Elected Leadership. Council and Mayor. Separation of powers and responsibilities in Council/ Manager Form of Government
Professional Management. City Manager. Administrative responsibilities, qualifications etc.
Finance and Accountability. How the proposed Charter enhances financial accountability.
Transition Timeline. Describing the transition plans in the next two years to prepare for 2020.
Research and Findings. What we learned from our surveys, interviews and research.
Saratoga Springs Elections and Participation. How citizens will engage in City government.